|
Vantage Point:
Myths and realities of cloning research
By DAVID MAGNUS, PhD
Last week’s news that a team of researchers in
South Korea successfully derived embryonic stem cells from a cloned human
embryo raises many pressing issues. Making babies is not one of them,
despite what some critics of cloning research say.
Right after the announcement of the first success in deriving stem cells
from a cloned human embryo, debate began about how the technology will
inevitably lead to the cloning of children. There is an enormous gap,
however, between the creation of a cloned embryo and a baby. Given the
difficulties in producing cloned primates, there is virtually no chance
that a cloned embryo produced today could ever become a child. The researchers
are not attempting to produce cloned children. Their interest is in developing
cures for diseases and disabilities.
This highlights the problem with the other objection to this research.
It is held by some that the cloned embryos that produce the stem cells
have the same moral status as children and that this research amounts
to murder. We should reject this view. These small clumps of cells that
are outside of the body do not have the ability to ever become more than
what they are. Weighing the value of something that will never develop
beyond a ball of cells versus the patients we see at Stanford Hospital
and Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital is not a difficult choice.
A promising avenue of research that may one day help alleviate the suffering
of patients who now die awaiting organs or any of dozens of other afflictions
must be developed.
The most important ethical issues raised by the Korean announcement are
what it presages about where the technology is going to be developed.
U.S. policy virtually prohibits expending federal funding on all forms
of embryonic stem cell research using cloned embryos or otherwise. This
means that this promising area of basic research is to be left in the
United States to the private sector and (increasingly) other countries.
Scientists here at Stanford and other universities are finding their efforts
to pursue this promising avenue of research stymied. Without the resources
of the NIH, or alternatively from a major investment from the state, U.S.
stem cell research will continue to fall behind. If legislation written
by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., (which was passed by the House of Representatives
last year) becomes law then even private-sector research would be banned.
This bill would even prohibit importation of cures derived from stem cells
– raising the specter that U.S. health care will fall behind the
rest of the world.
The research conducted by the team in South Korea also highlights a problem
with limiting federal funding. The researchers overseas obtained informed
consent and got approval for their procedures and forms by an Institutional
Review Board, or IRB. If this research took place in the United States
by a private biotech company, it would fall outside the federal regulatory
apparatus. Depending on where the research was conducted, there would
be no mandatory IRB oversight or even informed consent from those who
donated the DNA or eggs that produced the embryos. Fortunately, in California,
we have state law that offers some protection, ensuring those who donated
the DNA or eggs that produced the embryos would know what was going on
if a private company did the same experiments here.
It is important to remember that the fruits of stem cell research will
not be realized for a long time to come and it would be a mistake to race
to clinical trials before the basic research is done that allows us to
move forward in a safe and effective manner. But that makes it all the
more imperative that we allow government funding of a research area that
may one day answer the prayers of our patients.
David Magnus is co-director of the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics.
A version of this piece, co-written with Arthur Caplan, PhD, director
of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, appeared
Friday in the San Jose Mercury News.

|