Stanford Report, August 22, 2001 |
||
|
Electronic tags reveal stock boundaries ignored by bluefins BY MARK SHWARTZ/KEN PETERSON Bluefin tuna -- one of the most sought-after fish in the sea -- migrate thousands of miles across the Atlantic, according to a new study by Stanford biologist Barbara A. Block and a team of marine scientists.
Heidi
Dewar (left) and Dr. Barbara Block (right) of the Tuna Research and Conservation
Center place an archival electronic tag in an Atlantic bluefin tuna off
the coast of North Carolina.
Credit: Scott
Taylor Using electronic data recording tags placed on wild tuna, Block and
her fellow researchers discovered that some Western Atlantic bluefin mingle
with their counterparts from the Eastern Mediterranean -- a finding that
could have a profound impact on international efforts to conserve the
magnificent animal, whose numbers have sharply declined as a result of
intense commercial fishing in recent decades.
The study, published in the Aug. 17 issue of the journal Science,
emerged after five winters of electronic tagging by Block and colleagues
from the Tuna Research and Conservation Center (TRCC) -- a joint project
of Stanford's Hopkins Marine Station and the Monterey Bay Aquarium. Block,
lead author of the Science study, is the Charles and Elizabeth
Prothro Professor in Marine Science at Hopkins and director of TRCC. Scientists
from the National Marine Fisheries Service also participated in the study.
The majestic bluefin -- one of the few warm-blooded species of fish
-- can grow to 10 feet long and weigh 1,500 pounds. The animal is highly
prized by sushi and sashimi lovers, particularly in Japan where a single
fish weighing 444 pounds recently sold at auction for $175,000. Atlantic
bluefin in the Tokyo seafood market routinely sell for $8 to $45 per pound.
Commercial harvesting of bluefin and other Atlantic tuna is managed
through catch quotas established by the International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) based in Madrid, Spain
Electronic tags
In the Science study, Block and her fellow researchers analyzed
data recovered from electronic tags placed on bluefin off the East Coast
of North America starting in 1996. Of the original 377 electronic tags
deployed, 137 delivered data back to the researchers.
Most of the original tags (279) were "archival" -- electronic devices
that scientists surgically implanted inside the fish with the help of
commercial fishers off the coast of North Carolina. Forty-nine (49) archival
tags eventually were returned by fishers from throughout the North Atlantic
and the Mediterranean Sea.
The research team also deployed 98 "pop-up" satellite tags -- devices
externally fastened to the fish that detach and float to the surface at
a pre-programmed date. Data on depth, temperature and location were stored
on the pop-up tags during the mission and transmitted back to the lab
via satellite.
Tagging data revealed that Atlantic bluefin -- considered overexploited
in the Western Atlantic since 1982 -- often travel throughout the entire
North Atlantic and, in some cases, into the Mediterranean. Tuna tagged
in the Western Atlantic in most cases resided for a year or more on Western
North Atlantic feeding grounds. While many fish remained in the west,
some of the recaptured fish had migrated to the Eastern Atlantic or Mediterranean
Sea. Individuals also migrated from the Western Atlantic to the east and
back again in the same year.
Most fish showed at least one year of western residency traveling between
the Carolinas and New England and back again to the original release location.
The fidelity to these two locations and a third site near the Flemish
Cap, off Newfoundland, represents bluefin feeding aggregations.
Researchers also reported that the western-tagged bluefin travel to
distinct spawning grounds in the Gulf of Mexico or the Eastern Mediterranean.
Vulnerability
"The results indicate western-tagged bluefin are vulnerable to fishing
mortality from all Atlantic bluefin tuna fisheries," the authors write
in Science, noting that the tagging data emphasize "the need to
protect both major eastern and western spawning regions, as they directly
influence the western fishery."
This is an important consideration since the 2001 catch quota for Western
Atlantic fisheries (5.5 million pounds) is one-twelfth the quota for the
Eastern Atlantic fisheries (65 million pounds). Current management of
the fishery by ICCAT assumes that catches involve only a low level of
mixing between tunas from the Western and Eastern Atlantic.
ICCAT imposes strict quotas on fish caught in the Western Atlantic and
much more liberal quotas on bluefin landed in the Eastern Atlantic and
Mediterranean Sea. The Western Atlantic management is aimed at recovering
the breeding population to levels that produce "maximum sustainable yield."
The Eastern Atlantic breeding population is considered to be in decline
and overfished, although it is of greater overall abundance than the western
breeding population.
According to the Science study, "The electronic tagging data
indicate that mixing between the two management units exists at a higher
level than ICCAT has incorporated into . . . . stock assessments. However,
movements to distinct breeding grounds are apparent, suggesting a mixing
of stocks on feeding grounds and a separation to distinct breeding localities.
Future assessment of stock status should evaluate the new information
and reassess the management strategies applied to Atlantic bluefin tuna."
Block says that, "From the data, it's clear there are two breeding populations
of bluefin tuna that spend considerable time together on the rich Western
North Atlantic feeding grounds . . . . Our results demonstrate that bluefin
tuna are capable of ranging widely throughout the North Atlantic without
regard to the stock boundary in the mid-Atlantic. That means efforts to
bring about a recovery of bluefin tuna populations will require increased
cooperation among all nations fishing for bluefin tuna."
Tagging data revealed that bluefin dive to remarkable depths, at times
exceeding the 3,281-foot pressure sensors in the tags, although they spend
most of their time closer to the surface. The animals also displayed a
remarkable range of temperature preferences -- from near-freezing waters
when feeding (37 F) to very warm temperatures when breeding (86 F) --
while always maintaining a high internal temperature (around 77 F to 80
F) even in the most frigid waters.
The researchers reported the first descriptions of what they believe
to be breeding behavior in giant tunas. Most surprising is that the spawning
period occupies a short interval in the yearly activities-- -- less than
one month. A unique behavioral repertoire recorded by the electronic tags
suggests that the giant tunas breed at night in very warm waters, swimming
up and down in the water column for hours.
"Importantly," notes Block, "our data indicate that bluefin are sorting
to distinct breeding grounds where efforts to protect the breeding aggregations
should be increased." |
| |