Stanford Report, Oct. 22, 2003 |
||
|
New program seeks to add ethics infrastructure to all phases of Bio-X research BY LISA TREI
Bio-X will do more than break down barriers that have traditionally
separated scientists and engineers. Faculty from fields as diverse as
music, psychology and law also have been drawn into the initiative, enabling
Bio-X to build on the strengths of the entire campus.
"Stanford is a full-service university," said Associate Professor Barbara
Koenig, a medical anthropologist and a senior researcher at the Stanford
Center for Biomedical Ethics (SCBE). "It's not just a bunch of scientists
working in isolation. Stanford has everything."
To underscore the interdisciplinary appeal of Bio-X, Koenig, Professor
Hank Greely, law, and Associate Professor Debra Satz, philosophy, head
a Bio-X-sponsored program called "The Ethical Dimensions of Neuroscience
Research," which seeks to strengthen the "ethics infrastructure" of neuroscience
research across campus.
According to Koenig, scholars in philosophy, law and bioethics should
be included not only "downstream," when the products of basic research
are translated into clinical practice, but "upstream," as scientists make
choices about the content and actual practice of their work. "Our basic
goal is to try to create an intellectual community around these issues
that's very interdisciplinary," she said. "That's a challenge because
people look at things so differently."
Greely, a member of the Bio-X Scientific Leadership Council and chair
of SCBE's steering committee, explained that discoveries associated with
Bio-X are likely to have real ethical, legal and social implications.
"They're not doing research on quasars 50 billion light years away," he
said. Greely also is optimistic that Bio-X's interdisciplinary structure
will make it more open to nonscientists like himself. "To be an insider
in Bio-X you have to be an outsider," he said. "I think it will be a lot
easier to work in such an environment."
The three-year program supports a bimonthly "neuroethics" seminar for
faculty and graduate students and a journal club where scientific papers
are presented. It also brings together experts in fields ranging from
psychology and law to medicine to discuss the development of a new curriculum
for graduates, postdoctoral scholars and clinical trainees that will be
devoted to ethical issues in the neurosciences.
In addition, the initiative has funded four yearlong student research
projects exploring issues at the intersection of bioethics and the neurosciences.
The objective, Koenig said, is to teach students how to do research with
an ethics focus. Those selected this year -- graduate students Matthew
Kirschen, Moriah Thomason and Jonathan Loeb, and undergraduate Jennifer
Yoon -- were required to have at least two advisers in different fields.
Loeb, for example, is conducting a survey of neurobiological researchers
to learn more about the role of the scientist as citizen.
"Another goal [of the initiative] is to get scientists interested in
the fact that they have an obligation to be good public citizens about
the ethical issues that their science raises," Koenig said. "It's important
to instill in them ... that you have an obligation as a scientist to take
a public role and speak out. We're hoping to model that with some of the
faculty."
Koenig admits that interdisciplinary work is difficult but Bio-X makes
it easier. "We're trying to break down barriers that are artificial --
they just happen to be the way universities developed," she said. "They
shouldn't shape the way science is done -- and bioethics is done --
forever. If things never changed, we would all still be taking Greek."
Meanwhile, psychology Professor Brian Wandell, a member of the Bio-X
Scientific Leadership Council, said Bio-X until now has mostly been about
"who goes where" in the Clark Center. "The next year will show if it's
a housing project or a conceptual project," he said. "This next year will
be decisive. I hope it works."
|
|
|