Stanford Report, February 12, 2002 |
||
|
In Print & On the Air SCOTTY
McLENNAN, dean for religious
life, argued against the United States waging war on Iraq
in a San Francisco Chronicle op-ed piece Feb. 10.
McLennan noted that President George W. Bush, in his State
of the Union address, appeared to be making reference
to the "just war" criteria articulated for almost 2,000
years by the Christian church. Point by point, McLennan
argued that there can be no "just war" against Iraq. To
prosecute a war without UN support and without the backing
of the American public "would be folly at best and a disaster
at worst," he wrote. "The world becomes more dangerous
if the United States is seen as an aggressor nation engaged
in a pre-emptive war. ... Abraham Lincoln warned us that
right makes might, not the other way around." McLennan
concluded, "Basic moral and spiritual values are the lifeblood
of this country, and without them the American way of
life itself is in grave peril. We must not go to war with
Iraq."
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ON FEB. 7 AND 10 reported that NASA is investigating whether electricity in the upper atmosphere may have doomed the shuttle Columbia, which was traveling at an altitude of 39 miles when it disintegrated Feb. 1. A time-exposure image taken by an amateur astronomer showed a snake of purplish light corkscrewing through the shuttle's hot glowing trail as it crossed over California during re-entry into Earth's atmosphere. UMRAN INAN, professor of electrical engineering, said the ionosphere has been difficult to study because it's too high for balloons and aircraft, but too low for satellites. "You can't make local measurements with any regularity," he said. "You can have a single rocket shot through the region, but the phenomena are dynamic and change from place to place and time to time." ON
FEB. 9, BRIAN CANTWELL, the Edward
C. Wells Professor in the School of Engineering, told
the New York Times, "Despite the dangers, human
space flight is here to stay." Some analysts argue,
however, that it will take the far-sighted commitment
of sending people to Mars to reinvigorate the public's
excitement about space exploration that existed during
the Apollo missions 30 years ago. Such a goal could
galvanize development of new technology to reduce the
risks and long-term costs of human space flight, the
article noted. "Perhaps then, the debate over whether
humans should fly in space will fade just as it did
in an earlier era when air travel seemed silly and dangerous,"
Cantwell said. |
| |